Unfortunately all of Wallich’s names in the catalogue are considered “nomina nuda” and invalid, except where also published separately by him or other botanists. Wallich’s catalogue is available at the Biodiversity Heritage Library and catalogue number 7107 (compiled 1828) is P. involucrata. This would be the first published occurrence of the name, if it were not that it is invalid. The next validly published occurrence of Wallich’s P. involucrata is Duby in Prodromus [A. P. de Candolle], 8:42, 1844. Here a full description of P. involucrata was made and Wallich’s list number 7107 is referenced. This would then make Wallich’s species valid if not for one little problem.
In Sweet's Hortus Britannicus: Or a Catalogue of Plants Cultivated in the Gardens of Great Britain (1839) on page 562, there is a valid description for P. involucrata, citing that the plant is yellow flowered, involucred, from Egypt and figured in Curtis’s Botanical Magazine, t. 2842 (1828). The species described is not the same as Wallich's plant. Sweet's valid description predates the Duby publication and so the name P. involucrata was not available to be used by Duby and therefore P. involucrata (Duby) becomes a later homonym of P. involucrata (Sweet).
The next validly published description for Wallich’s species was P. munroi, made by Lindley in Edward’s Botanical Register, 33, t. 15 (1847). So P. munroi becomes the valid name for the species we are all so familiar with.
P. munroi subsp. yargongensis (L), P. munroi subsp. munroi (C), P. munroi subsp. schizocalyx (R) |
0 comments :
Post a Comment