A Primula from the Miocene - P. riosiae
The Miocene
is a geological period extending from 23 million to 5.3 million years ago. It
is during this time period that the apes arose and humans split to become their
own lineage, open grasslands became more prominent and by the end of it almost
95% of modern seed plant families existed.
Evolutionary
studies about our own primitive human ancestors makes the news with each
exciting discovery, but behind the scenes, the evolution of the Primulaceae is also
the focus of ongoing studies. Though genetic studies help us understand the relationships between species, other characteristics, such as seed morphology can be used to help differentiate plant species and to group related species. These days imaging seeds is easily done with clear results. See my Blog post Bringing Seeds into Focus.
That is in part what Primula evolutionary studies hope to uncover but we can peek into the past and seed what a Primula seed looked like. The image above is the result of a Paleocarpological study done from samples collected in a lignite mine at Berzdorf, Germany which were dated to the lower and upper Miocene. Three seeds were found and they were then described by Alexander Czaja as a new species called Primula riosiae after Mrs. Anabel Rios in a paper titled "Paläokarpologische Untersuchungen von Taphozönosen des Unter- und Mittelmiozäns aus dem Braunkohlentagebau Berzdorf/Oberlausitz (Sachsen)" published in Palaeontographica Abteilung B Band 265 Lieferung 1-6 (2003), p. 49. The description is brief, but it is noted that the seed shows cells on the surface characteristic of many modern Primula seeds and that the seed bears a resemblance to Primula ruprechtii Kusn., which is considered a synonym of Primula elatior. Two recent papers which have used P. riosiae in their studies are : "Heterostyly accelerates diversification via reduced extinction in primrose" by de Vos et. al. and "Phylogeny and biogeography of Primula sect. Armerina: implications for plant evolution under climate change and the uplift of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau" by Ren et. al.
Primula rebeccae A.J. Richards a synonym for Primula tenella King
Primula tenella was first discovered in the Chumbi valley, Tibet and was described by King ex Watt in Journal of the Linnean Society. Botany 20:13. 1882 (with a drawing) and also Hooker from Flora of British India 3:492.
Subsequently, in 2008 and 2009, Margaret Thorne travelled to Jangothang and was able to photograph the population in detail showing this species to be highly variable. Notice the flower size, color, petal shape variation in the image above. Also notice how the leaves vary in shape with the exposure, back to front. See also the Species Gallery under P. tenella for more images.
In 1944, George Sherriff photographed Primula tenella (#16314) at the Lingshi Glacier, just 10kms away from the P. rebeccae type location. It is obviously the same species as that found by the Miehe's and even though the image is black and white, the pale eye of the flowers is apparent.
![]() |
| Chumbi Valley - Reproduced by permission of Durham University Library and the Bentley Beetham Trust |
W.W. Smith in The Genus Primula: Section Minutissimae. Trans. Bot. Soc. Edinb. 33:227-266. (1942), says “P. tenella was first collected in 1878 and again in 1879 in the
Chumbi Valley, S. Tibet, by Dungboo, Sir George King’s collector. King recognized
it as a new species and on the type (Dungaboo, anno 1878, in Herb. Calc.) has
himself written the name giving the locality as Goop, 13 miles from Phari.” The holotype is presumably still at CAL, now Botanical Survey of India, Howrah, but there is no image of the type online.
At the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh is an isotype of a single plant with no location information or date, E00024523 and a second sheet collected by Dungboo in 1879 from Seain Chu(?), Chumbi, not available online. In Kew herbarium, there are two sheets online, K000639442, and K000639443. In Paris there is one sheet, P04907201. The exact location of Goop is unknown, and access to the Chumbi Valley is restricted, so images from the approximate type location are not available.
![]() |
| Primula rebeccae from the original description |
In 2000, Sabine and Georg Miehe found a Primula species growing near Jangothang, Bhutan (27°46'3.01"N 89°20'4.66"E) "at about 4000m and was confined to shady crevices amongst boulders in the vertically river-cut precipice between the flood-plain of the Pa Chu River and the adjoining river terrace. Here it grew in gregarious groups and clumps in a sandy-silt matrix on moss-dominated banks." The Miehe's also found similar plants higher up in the nearby Tso Phu Valley. This species was subsequently described by A.J. Richards as Primula rebeccae in Plantsman n.s., 3(1): 54. 2004. and the holotype is in Edinburgh, E00180782. The type location for P. rebeccae is about 36kms away from the type location for P. tenella.
![]() |
| Type location for Primula rebeccae |
![]() |
| Variations |
![]() |
| Primula tenella by George Sherriff |
![]() |
| Primula caveana |
In the original description of P. rebeccae, Richards compared the species to Primula caveana in Section Cordifoliae, a larger species which also grows in the same area. Differences given between the two species were the smaller calyx, filiform (thread like) pedicels, usually solitary flowers, emarginated petals and a pale eye and tube in P. rebeccae. However Richards did not compare the new species with P. tenella in Section Minutissimae, an obvious oversight. It is easy to see that P. rebeccae has the characteristic wedge shaped leaves shown in the original drawing with the original description of P. tenella and that it matches in everyway the (brief) original description of P. tenella.
Below is a map showing some historical collections and the location for P. rebeccae.
![]() |
| Red- tenella, Blue - rebeccae, Yellow - caveana (Yellow line is Tibet- Bhutan border) |
Primula longipinnatifida
Primula blinii has numerous synonyms reflecting the variability
of this species. One of the synonyms cited in the Flora of China is P.
longipinnatifida F.H. Chen. This species was collected by T. T. Yü, NW of Wa-Erh-Dje, alt 2800m under woods in 1937. It
was described in the article “An Enumeration of Primula Collected by Mr. T.T. Yü
From Northwestern Yunnan” by Feng-Hwai Chen in Bull. Fan Mem. Inst. Biol., Bot.
1940. In the original description, Chen compared the specimen to Primula incisa
Franchet which is a synonym of P. blinii.
P. longipinnatifida was distinguished from P. incisa by having longer pinnatifid leaves, membranaceous in texture
and by the smaller corolla tube. Chen cited Yü 6146 in the Herbarium, Yunnan
Bot. Inst. (now KUN - Kunming Institute of Botany) but this is an error and the correct collection number is
6046.
So why discuss this? In 2014 I visited the Kunming herbarium and looked at the holotype specimen of P. longipinnatifida. I was quite surprised that this species was so distinct, especially when compared to the type specimen of P. blinii. The leaves are so dissected they almost defy description. The texture of the leaves is like tissue paper and are not like those of P. blinii, rather they resemble P. runcinata which has leaves that aren’t quite so deeply pinnatifid and which has a different (racemose) flower arrangement.
Wa-Erh-Dje (now Waerzhai) monastery 28°31'53.51"N 100°55'9.06"E was one of three royal residences of the Muli King and was visited by Joseph Rock and illustrated in The National Geographic Magazine in July 1931. Rock described the location of the monastery as “3 days north of Muli”, Muli being the old site of Muli monastery not the present day town named Muli which is 50kms to the SE. Muli county is considered a Tibetan autonomous county within the Province of Sichuan and was an independent kingdom until 1950. The present day county is split into three districts following the three most important monasteries: Muli, Kulu (Kangwu) and Wachin (Waerzhai). Travel in the northern part of Muli is restricted but foreigners are allowed access to the southern part though it is considered dangerous to travel there with its history of revolts and bandits. Some modern images exist of Waerzhai showing the old monastery ruins and the modern replacement.
There is no indication by Yü how far to the NW of Wa-Erh-Dje the specimens were collected though the monastery is at 3300m and the collection altitude of 2800m is reached quickly in that direction as you descend to the river valley. Kunming herbarium has other specimens from Muli collected by Yü in the same year filed under P. blinii but unfortunately they are not imaged online so it is impossible to tell at present if they show plants closer to P. longipinnatifida or P. blinii (in the original sense).
This is one of those species that we need more information about and images from the wild showing population variation would go a long way to determining it's relationship with other species. We can only hope that someone will find this species again in the near future.
![]() |
| Yü 6046 - Photo P. Eveleigh, courtesy Kunming Institute of Botany |
![]() |
| Yü 6046 label - Photo P. Eveleigh, courtesy Kunming Institute of Botany |
So why discuss this? In 2014 I visited the Kunming herbarium and looked at the holotype specimen of P. longipinnatifida. I was quite surprised that this species was so distinct, especially when compared to the type specimen of P. blinii. The leaves are so dissected they almost defy description. The texture of the leaves is like tissue paper and are not like those of P. blinii, rather they resemble P. runcinata which has leaves that aren’t quite so deeply pinnatifid and which has a different (racemose) flower arrangement.
![]() |
| Yü 6046 inflorescence detail - Photo P. Eveleigh, courtesy Kunming Institute of Botany |
![]() |
| Yü 6046 leaf detail - Photo P. Eveleigh, courtesy Kunming Institute of Botany |
Wa-Erh-Dje (now Waerzhai) monastery 28°31'53.51"N 100°55'9.06"E was one of three royal residences of the Muli King and was visited by Joseph Rock and illustrated in The National Geographic Magazine in July 1931. Rock described the location of the monastery as “3 days north of Muli”, Muli being the old site of Muli monastery not the present day town named Muli which is 50kms to the SE. Muli county is considered a Tibetan autonomous county within the Province of Sichuan and was an independent kingdom until 1950. The present day county is split into three districts following the three most important monasteries: Muli, Kulu (Kangwu) and Wachin (Waerzhai). Travel in the northern part of Muli is restricted but foreigners are allowed access to the southern part though it is considered dangerous to travel there with its history of revolts and bandits. Some modern images exist of Waerzhai showing the old monastery ruins and the modern replacement.
There is no indication by Yü how far to the NW of Wa-Erh-Dje the specimens were collected though the monastery is at 3300m and the collection altitude of 2800m is reached quickly in that direction as you descend to the river valley. Kunming herbarium has other specimens from Muli collected by Yü in the same year filed under P. blinii but unfortunately they are not imaged online so it is impossible to tell at present if they show plants closer to P. longipinnatifida or P. blinii (in the original sense).
This is one of those species that we need more information about and images from the wild showing population variation would go a long way to determining it's relationship with other species. We can only hope that someone will find this species again in the near future.
The Mexican Primula
There are 21 Primula species listed for North America, and we
usually think that means "in the USA and Canada". However there is one Primula
which is found in Mexico. That species is Primula rusbyi. It is also found in
the US states of Arizona and New Mexico. It is speculated that because it
occurs in the Sierra Madre de Chiapas Mountains of Mexico, that it could also
occur in the extension of those mountains into Guatemala. Occurrences from the Intermountain Region Herbarium Network show herbarium samples from the mountains of the Mexican states of Durango, Zacatecas, Coahuila and Chihuahua.
The species P. ellisiae was described from individual plants from the Sandia Mountains, New Mexico based on longer calyx lobes in relation to the tube and a larger sized seed capsule. These characteristics vary within populations and according to the Flora of North America “preliminary genetic analyses (S. Kelso and P. Beardsley, unpubl.) reveal no substantive genetic distinction between these individuals and those from elsewhere in the range”. The name “Primula ellisiae” persists in cultivation but should be corrected to Primula rusbyi.
Primula rusbyi
comes from mountain locations in dry areas but survives on moist slopes and cliff
edges.
The species P. ellisiae was described from individual plants from the Sandia Mountains, New Mexico based on longer calyx lobes in relation to the tube and a larger sized seed capsule. These characteristics vary within populations and according to the Flora of North America “preliminary genetic analyses (S. Kelso and P. Beardsley, unpubl.) reveal no substantive genetic distinction between these individuals and those from elsewhere in the range”. The name “Primula ellisiae” persists in cultivation but should be corrected to Primula rusbyi.
![]() |
| Calyx equals the tube |
![]() |
| Calyx 2x's the tube |
![]() |
| P. rusbyi in habitat |
Primula strumosa vs Primula sikkimensis
Being able to identify a species in the field is like being able to recognize a friend in a crowd. The more familiar you are with your friend’s features, the easier it is to find him. If you aren’t sure of a particular species, botanical keys can help you determine an identity, but that requires you to be familiar with some technical botanical terms.
When I was recently asked to distinguish between P. strumosa and P. sikkimensis, my answer included technical terms which not everyone was familiar with. Part of my reasons for starting the website “Primula World – A Visual Reference for the Genus Primula” at www.primulaworld.com was to be able to show the important characteristics of species and their variations through images.
Primula strumosa and Primula sikkimensis are both yellow flowered species found in a large area of the Himalaya including Nepal. They belong to different Sections (groupings) in the Genus, with P. sikkimensis being in Section Sikkimensis and P. strumosa being in Section Petiolares. Species in each Section are grouped according to common characteristics.
Though both of these species have yellow flowers, the structure of those flowers is different. P. sikkimensis has campanulate (bell shaped) flowers, and the calyx (the cup shaped structure at the base of the flower) is split to the middle into sharp triangular teeth (indicated by the red arrow). P. strumosa has flat faced flowers with a calyx split to the middle but into blunt (rounded) teeth (indicated by the red arrow).
The leaves of these two species are also different. P. sikkimensis has leaves which are of a thin, papery texture and usually has a fairly distinct petiole (leaf stalk) whereas P. strumosa has leathery leaves with a broadly winged petiole (that is, no distinct leaf stalk).
Primula strumosa overwinters above ground as a resting bud. This resting bud is covered in yellow farina (a powdery substance) and the bud scales remain around the base of the plant, under the true leaves. Primula sikkimensis is deciduous and disappears completely below ground until Spring therefor it has no bud scales.
Most Primula species have seed capsules which split into 5 parts and empty from the top of the capsule. Members of Section Petiolares have a different capsule where a thin membrane covers the seeds which eventually disintegrates, releasing the seeds.
When I was recently asked to distinguish between P. strumosa and P. sikkimensis, my answer included technical terms which not everyone was familiar with. Part of my reasons for starting the website “Primula World – A Visual Reference for the Genus Primula” at www.primulaworld.com was to be able to show the important characteristics of species and their variations through images.
![]() |
| Primula sikkimensis |
![]() |
| Primula strumosa |
Though both of these species have yellow flowers, the structure of those flowers is different. P. sikkimensis has campanulate (bell shaped) flowers, and the calyx (the cup shaped structure at the base of the flower) is split to the middle into sharp triangular teeth (indicated by the red arrow). P. strumosa has flat faced flowers with a calyx split to the middle but into blunt (rounded) teeth (indicated by the red arrow).
![]() |
| Primula sikkimensis flowers |
![]() |
| Primula strumosa flowers |
![]() |
| Primula sikkimensis leaf |
![]() |
| Primula strumosa leaf |
![]() |
| Primula strumosa resting bud |
![]() |
| Primula sikkimensis seed capsule |
![]() |
| Primula strumosa seed capsule |


























